{"id":29044,"date":"2021-08-24T11:00:11","date_gmt":"2021-08-24T15:00:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/?p=29044"},"modified":"2021-08-04T10:27:37","modified_gmt":"2021-08-04T14:27:37","slug":"miter-joints-with-different-sized-weldment-profiles-in-solidworks-2021","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/2021\/08\/miter-joints-with-different-sized-weldment-profiles-in-solidworks-2021.html","title":{"rendered":"Miter Joints with Different Sized Weldment Profiles in SOLIDWORKS 2021"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Creating structural members for welded, bolted of framed designs has always been a breeze in SOLIDWORKS, thanks to the SOLIDWORKS WELDMENTS functionality found in the SOLIDWORKS Standard, SOLIDWORKS Professional and SOLIDWORKS Premium software bundles. For years, SOLIDWORKS users have enjoyed the benefits of working from a library of simple 2D profiles and applying these profiles to a \u201cframework\u201d of 2D or 3D sketches. This allowed user to create a structure similar to what is shown in the following image:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image202-20.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-29039 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image202-20.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1084\" height=\"511\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image202-20.png 1084w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image202-20-300x141.png 300w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image202-20-615x290.png 615w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image202-20-768x362.png 768w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image202-20-728x343.png 728w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1084px) 100vw, 1084px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>But the above image shows a challenge that SOLIDWORKS Weldment users have long struggled with: How do you miter a joint that occurs at the intersection of 2 different sized profiles?<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image203-21.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-29042 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image203-21.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1302\" height=\"595\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image203-21.png 1302w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image203-21-300x137.png 300w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image203-21-615x281.png 615w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image203-21-768x351.png 768w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image203-21-728x333.png 728w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1302px) 100vw, 1302px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In previous versions of SOLIDWORKS, the user would have to manually \u201cmatch\u201d these 2 structural members at the mitered corner. This typically meant creating a sketch and calculating the correct \u201cmatching angle\u201d, then doing a cut-extrude at each of these corners. This became a time-consuming process as it required several features \u2013 typically a sketch, a cut extrude, and an extend feature.<br \/>\nSOLIDWORKS 2021 introduces a great new tool to address this challenge: the option for FULL FLUSH corners when using the Miter Trim\/Extend feature.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image204-21.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-29037 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image204-21.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"697\" height=\"681\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image204-21.png 697w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image204-21-300x293.png 300w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image204-21-615x601.png 615w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 697px) 100vw, 697px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>In the current challenge (shown in the image below) we can see that we have a series of 60mm x 40mm rectangular tube members coming together with some 40mm x 40mm square tube members.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image205-19.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-29038 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image205-19.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1312\" height=\"619\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image205-19.png 1312w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image205-19-300x142.png 300w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image205-19-615x290.png 615w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image205-19-768x362.png 768w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image205-19-728x343.png 728w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1312px) 100vw, 1312px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>When working with SOLIDWORKS Weldments in previous versions of SOLIDWORKS, users had struggled with the challenge of matching 2 different sized profiles at a mitered corner. When users attempted to work with the trim\/extend tool and use the miter joint option, they would be presented with the solution shown in the following image:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image206-18.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-29036 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image206-18.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"710\" height=\"735\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image206-18.png 710w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image206-18-290x300.png 290w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image206-18-594x615.png 594w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 710px) 100vw, 710px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nThis option worked great when the 2 structural profiles were the same size, as SOLIDWORKS would calculate the bisecting angle between the two members, and create a miter at this bisecting angle leaving an equal angle miter cut on each structural member. But when the structural member profiles were of 2 different sizes, this would not be the desired result, as you will need to cut 2 different angles. A true bisecting angle would leave one member too long, and one member too short, as shown in the above image.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image207-20.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-29043 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image207-20.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"635\" height=\"642\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image207-20.png 635w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image207-20-297x300.png 297w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image207-20-608x615.png 608w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image207-20-120x120.png 120w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 635px) 100vw, 635px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nIn the new Tim\/Extend interface found in SOLIDWORKS 2021, we can see a new option \u2013 the FULL FLUSH option. This option automatically solves the correct angle for structural member 1 and structural member 2. It then performs both a trim and an extend, with a different angle on each structural member, to leave you with a perfectly flush miter between the 2 structural members. This reduces the number of features needed and the amount of time it takes to calculate the perfect angle between these 2 differently shaped structural members.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image208-18.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-29041 aligncenter\" src=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image208-18.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"1046\" height=\"563\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image208-18.png 1046w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image208-18-300x161.png 300w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image208-18-615x331.png 615w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image208-18-768x413.png 768w, https:\/\/blog-assets.solidworks.com\/uploads\/sites\/4\/image208-18-728x392.png 728w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1046px) 100vw, 1046px\" \/><\/a><br \/>\nSOLIDWORKS 2021 introduced a great new miter option in the Trim\/Extend command \u2013 the FULL FLUSH option for a structural member miter joint. With this tool users can quickly match 2 differently shaped structural members with a perfectly flush miter. This will be a great time saver for any SOLIDWORKS users who work with the SOLIDWORKS Weldments commands!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Creating structural members for welded, bolted of framed designs has always been a breeze in SOLIDWORKS, thanks to the SOLIDWORKS WELDMENTS functionality found in the SOLIDWORKS Standard, SOLIDWORKS Professional and SOLIDWORKS Premium software bundles. For years, SOLIDWORKS users have enjoyed<\/p>\n... <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/2021\/08\/miter-joints-with-different-sized-weldment-profiles-in-solidworks-2021.html\">Continued<\/a>","protected":false},"author":474,"featured_media":29040,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2823,35],"tags":[2908,144,453,499],"class_list":["post-29044","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-solidworks-2021","category-tips-tricks","tag-miter-joints","tag-tech-tips","tag-tips-and-tricks","tag-weldments"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29044","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/474"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29044"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29044\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29046,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29044\/revisions\/29046"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29040"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29044"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29044"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.solidworks.com\/tech\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29044"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}